parenting Essay -- essays research papers

There ar somewhat grounds to assume that a cognitive dissonance is involved in feeling that children are more(prenominal) a satisfaction than a nuisance. Why do people exsert with parenting? It is time consuming, exhausting, strains otherwise pleasurable and tranquil relationships to their limits. Still, humanity keeps at it breeding. It is the easiest to fix to Nature. After every last(predicate), all living species breed and near of them parent. We are, all taken into consideration, animals and, therefore, subject to the same instinctive behaviour patterns. There is no psyche in looking for a reason survival itself (whether of the gene kitty or, on a high level, of the species) is at stake. Breeding is a send mechanism handing the precious cargo of genetics down generations of "organic containers". tho this is a reductionist view, which both ignores epistemological and emotional realities and is tautological, thereby explaining something in terms of itself. Ca lling something by a different name or describing the mechanisms involved in minute detail does not an explanation make. low hypothesis we bring children to the world in order to "circumvent" death. We lay down immortality (genetically and psychologically though in both cases it is imaginary) by propagating our genetic fabric through the medium of our offspring. This is a highly dubious claim. Any analysis, til now shallow, will reveal its weaknesses. Our genetic material gets diluted beyond reconstruction with time. It constitutes 50% of the first generation, 25% of the second and so on. If this were the paramount adjoin incest should have been the norm, being a behaviour better able to redeem a specific set of genes (especially today, when genetic screening can effectively guard against the birth of defective babies). Moreover, progeny is a dubious style of perpetuating ones self. No one remembers ones great great grandfathers. Ones memory is better bear on by intellectual feats or architectural monuments. The latter are very much better conduits than children and grandchildren. Still, this indoctrinated misconception is so strong that a baby boom characterizes authority war periods. Having been existentially threatened, people multiply in the vain belief that they then best protect their genetic heritage and fixate their memory. In the better-educated, higher income, low infant mort... ...en, he develops a circle of admirers, cronies and friends which he "nurtures and cultivates" in order to obtain Narcissistic Supply from them. He overvalues them (they are the brightest, the most loyal, with the biggest chances to climb the corporate ladder and other superlatives). But following some anti-narcissistic behaviours on their part (a critical remark, a disagreement, a refusal, however polite, all constitute such behaviours) the narcissist devalues all these previously over-valued individuals. Now they are stupid, lack ambition, skills and talents, common (the worst expletive in the narcissists vocabulary), with an unspectacular locomote ahead of them. The narcissist feels that he is misallocating his resources (for instance, his time). He feels besieged and suffocated. He rebels and erupts in a serious of self-defeating and self-destructive behaviours, which lead to the disintegration of his life. fated to build and ruin, attach and detach, appreciate and depreciate, the narcissist is predictable in his goal Wish. What sets him apart from other suicidal types is that his wish is granted to him in small, tormenting doses end-to-end his anguished life.