The issues surrounding Abortion Essay Example for Free

The issues surrounding Abortion Essay exempt how a attendant of natural law might approach the issues surrounding Abortion. congenital Law, as sketch and enforced by Thomas Aquinas, says that every living thing has a purpose, and that every solution to a dilemma and every action tummy be solved by reasoning, which will gain you crowning(prenominal) happiness. This Is linked with Aristotles idea that everyone has a specific purpose, and the Primary Precepts can help you to achieve your purpose. This is key intimacy to help with the understanding of Natural Law followers views about miscarriage. Human reasoning in all dilemma or problematic situation should be applied to the Primary Precepts of Natural Law. The both(prenominal) of import pedagogys that be concerned in Natural Law with abortion are The Preservation of Life and Reproduction. Generally, conformist to Natural Law, the right action to take would be one that conforms to all the precepts, however with abortion it is not quite as simple.The first Precept to consider when thinking about abortion from a Natural Law followers state of mind would be Reproduction. The precept of Reproduction states that it is always right to gain ground reproduction, and most nearly always wrong to prevent reproduction. Applying this to abortion would result in a follower of Natural Law believing that abortion is wrong. This is because the act of aborting a foetus, or baby, is preventing the act of reproduction, and in that respectfore freeing against one of Aquinas Primary Precepts Preservation of Life. Natural Law does not consider the people touch on or most of the consequences, merely more on the act of abortion itself. Reproduction as know is a Primary Precept of Natural Law, and because the act of abortion stops procreation then it is frowned upon by Natural Law followers.The act of abortion can also disturb the precept of Preservation of Life. This precept states that it is always right to help save or maintain a life, and always wrong to test and intentionally. However this is only if one believes that life begins at conception. Abortion involves taking the life of a foetus that you believe to be a human life, which in turn act against the precept of the Preservation of Life, as you not preserving life, but taking one away.However, at that place are a few exceptions. Aquinas philosophy of Double effect applies these exceptions. Aquinas saw the precepts as absolutely true for every single being, and that development our reasoning can bring us to the right solution in every situation. However there are times when in order to conform to one precept, we must decide to act against another.For moral there is a pregnant woman, however for medical reasons carrying on with the pregnancy would end in her death. She has two choices, one halt the baby and end her own life or two have an abortion and save her own life. The first solution would go against the precept of the Preservat ion of Life, where the second would go against both the Preservation of Life and Reproduction. In this case it is okay for a person to come to a competent solution through reasoning, as whatever happens there will be bad consequences. However, this is only pleasant if the bad consequence is but an unwanted side effect of the action with good intent.All in all, abortion acts against two of the Primary Precepts of Natural Law, which clearly makes it a bad action. Even though there are a few exceptions, these are only in the worst of situations, and on the whole, abortion is simply wrong according to Natural Law.A foetus is not a person Discuss.There are many different opinions and arguments as to when a Foetus becomes a person, and these all play different but key roles into solving many huge arguments. To hope to solve this argument is absurd, however the different viewpoints can be stated and analysed to find the strongest.One way in which to argue whether or not a Foetus is a pe rson is to apply it to the criteria of Personhood. These criteria are suggested by Mary Anne Warren, and are Sentience, Emotionality, Reason, Ability to Communicate, Self-awareness and righteous agency. Conforming to these criteria would pixilated the a Foetus cannot be classed as a person, as it does not depart into any of these criteria.However, later on in the development of a Foetus it begins to fit into some of the criteria, such(prenominal) as Sentience. Could this mean that a foetus slowly becomes a person? Mary Anne Warren suggests that a Foetus is a potential person, but says that it does not have a right to life, which really does not solve any arguments as to whether or not a Foetus is a person.It is also argued that a potential life, as proposed by Mary Anne Warren, does not have any rights or privileges. This would also mean that a Foetus does not have access to human rights, and the right to life. So that begs the question, if something does not have access to human rights, is it a person?